My blogging has been pitiful lately, as I’m spending a ridiculous amount of time working. So instead of looking for things to write about, the only time I’ve been writing lately is when a story finds me somehow. But over the weekend, someone from a startup wouldn’t let me ignore them. That startup is called NeedCube.
Here’s how it happened. About a week ago, I received the following email:
Hello,
one of my friend referred to your site that I find amazing.
I have just launched my project and would like to get help to publicize it.
Is this something you could help me? Any opportunity to write an article about it, or something like that?
Check out the site here: http://needcube.com
The idea is to have a unified central place for people’s needs.
No categories, no hassle, only keywords and proprietary search mechanisms.
The main idea is centered around the DEMAND side and not the supply. You may come and register your needs.
At a certain point the sellers will come and search for the stuff they have to offer and see if anyone needs it via the need search engine.
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Gery
Okay. I’m guessing that the person from NeedCube isn’t a native English speaker, so I don’t have any issues with the grammatical content of the email. And I like the approach: Reach out to a blogger, compliment them on their blog, and ask them to write about the product. It’s simple, succinct, and actionable. Not bad.
But then I got another email the next day:
Hi there,
I already got a nice review of my startup:
http://www.killerstartups.com/Search/needcube-com-turning-the-search-process-around
Check it out!
Gery
When I first read this, I honestly thought Gery was saying “I already got a review, so don’t bother.” But on second glance, I liked the approach here as well: point to a proof-point that the startup is worth writing about. And since I’m not the kind of blogger that cares about breaking news or exclusivity (especially since I almost never write!!), this definitely wouldn’t dissuade me from covering it.
But, I was at work, and I just forgot about it. Until yesterday.
Yesterday I got the following note on facebook:
Dear Nathan,
could you please help me publicize our very new and pretty unique service launch? It is about a unified central place for people’s needs.
http://www.facebook.com/l/2dba8;needcube.com
Thanks,
Gery
Well, I had no more excuses. It was time to take a look at NeedCube. First step: the coverage they’ve already received from Killerstartups-
NeedCube is quite an interesting site. It can be defined as a sort of reverse matching mechanism for people’s needs. That is, instead of executing a search when you need to find anything, here you can set down what it is that you want and be notified the moment it becomes available.
All right. Easy enough concept to understand, but then I saw this nugget:
You are asked 5 simple questions when you are specifying what you need: “what”, “when”, “where”, “how many” and “for how much”. You are not actually required to categorize what you need, and you are saved the hassle of registering to several sites serving different categories. In that sense, NeedCube aims to stand as one unified place for all your requirements.
So wait. You don’t categorize anything? Doesn’t that make it difficult to, you know, find things? Either way, the killerstartups review had my attention, so I decided to check out the site.

My first thought: Whoa. For a site that bills itself as easy to use and intuitive, there’s an awful lot of text to explain what to do. From the site:
NeedCube is EASY to use!
There is only one step ahead of you, or maybe two.
2. If you feel you need more information or help to get started with
NeedCube go to
FAQ.
If you have something to offer on the web, go right into Needs and check if someone has the same need. If your offer is needed there will be an instant match, go ahead and complete the transaction.
I love it. There is only one step….or maybe two. That’s kind of awesome. All right, let’s dive right in and see what’s up.

Pretty standard right? Well, you can’t see it, but the Terms and Conditions link goes to a PDF. Interesting choice, but hey, let’s plow forward.
Once your account is activated and you sign in, here’s the main screen:

So we’ve got car parts, iPhones, something in Chinese, and rental housing all together in the same screen with no way to categorize anything, or filter items. An example:
I need an apartman in Nassfeld ski area in January 2010 for 11 people, preferably close to the skirun for approx 30 Euro/person (After 1/4/2010 / Nassfeld - Austria)
If I were able to filter out only the things that I’m interested in buying or selling, I’d never see this. But without viewing options, I’m guaranteed to see things that are irrelevant to me. And as someone that wants something, I’m not sure how anyone would find me in the first place.
My Thoughts On NeedCube
The Concept: I like the idea of having one centralized repository for what you’re looking for, but only if that repository syndicates what I want to other social services. Otherwise, what’s the point of entering the details of what I need here if I’m going to need to do the same thing on craigslist too?
The Problem: It looks like NeedCube is trying to solve the “it takes too long to find what I need” problem, and I’m not sure that’s really a problem for me. Also, I’m not sure there’s any kind of time savings for posting a need on NeedCube, as their community is exceptionally small (hey, it’s early, I get it), and I’d just have to wait for someone to get back to me.
NeedCube also seems to highlight their lack of categorization as a benefit, and I think that’s a mistake. Once the site gets more than 17 needs, how are people going to find items? Additionally, if I really needed a bumper pool table, I’m not going to be interested in one from someone in Sweden, as the shipping cost alone would be a show-stopper. So apart from categories, NeedCube would need geographic filtering for me to use it.
The Pitch: I really was impressed by the multi-touch, lead nurturing-like approach they’re taking to get coverage. I liked the way they engaged me in both email and facebook. Very, very good.
Overall: This is one of those chicken-and-egg deals. There’s not enough traffic and not enough members yet, so there are very few items on the site. Because there are very few items, people shy away from signing up. And when they do sign up, they see that there’s no way to find things relevant to what they have.
But again, it’s early. If the service was a centralized repository that took input from a user and syndicated that need across many services (both geographically and by category), then it could have some real benefit.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Loading ...