Today is apparently â€œBeacon Dayâ€ in Wurreyville. I was going to post today (and donâ€™t worry, still will tomorrow) a fun little write up of â€œBest Holiday Gifts to Buy the Geek in Your Life,â€ but got sidetracked by a day-long obsession with the Facebook Beacon. It dominated todayâ€™s CustomScoop’s PR Blog Jots, and I just recorded a Media Monitoring Minute about it for tomorrowâ€™s For Immediate Release.
While Iâ€™d love to assume that most people reading this are already well-aware of Facebookâ€™s recently unveiled â€œsocial adâ€ system, allow me to explain for anyone still in the dark. Facebook has teamed up with outside vendors (Overstock.com and Amazon.com, to name a couple) and embedded cookies in your browser in order to track user purchases for advertising purposes.
This means if youâ€™re making a purchase on Amazon, you ought to get a pop-up asking for permission to send your purchase to your Facebook newsfeed. They call it a â€œsocial adâ€ because it pops out like â€œHey! Your friend Sarah Wurrey just purchased â€œHow to be Awesome,â€ by Sarah Wurrey, on Amazon.com! Wouldnâ€™t you like to learn how to be awesome?â€ on your friendsâ€™ home pages.
This has caused a bit of hysteria among bloggers, and MoveOn.org is sponsoring a (so far meager) online petition against the service. The posts railing on Facebook for invasion of privacy are flying fast and furious, and even the mainstream press has picked up on the story. At first, I was left kind of rolling my eyes and wondering if bloggers weren’t being a little naive. Online privacy is something of an oxymoron after all, isn’t it?
Initially, I didnâ€™t think the Beacon was such a bad idea. I assume nothing I do online is private. Nothing. There are many things I do online that I would never want made public (like banking, get your minds out of the gutter). The potential loss of privacy is just the risk I accept in order to pay all my bills in five minutes while sacked out on my couch watching 90210 reruns on SoapNet. I feel the same way about online shoppingâ€”if itâ€™s a purchase you reeeally donâ€™t want anyone to know about, maybe donâ€™t do it online. (Which is what cracks me up so much about that ubiquitous spam offering drugs that will do wonders for a man’s, um, manhood–would a guy with that particular problem really risk ordering something online to solve it? How dumb would he have to be!?)
Aside from that, you have to give permission for the information picked up by Beacon to be shared, right? â€¦ Um, right? Hereâ€™s where Beacon lost me. I read about Charlene Liâ€™s experience, in which her new coffee table purchase wound up in her newsfeed without her knowledge or consent. Then I read a comment on that post in which one of her readers noted the same thing happened to him, except it was AN ENGAGEMENT RING FOR HIS GIRLFRIEND.
At least that makes a funny engagement story to tell at the rehearsal dinner, eh? And hey, that best manâ€™s speech is practically writing itself! (â€œIâ€™m sure all of you have already read my speech on Facebook, but I may as well give it anyway, since weâ€™re all here, ha haâ€¦â€)
The problem seems to be putting all the responsibility of keeping private information private on the consumer. This comment from my Blog Jots post on this best sums up the problem with forcing the customer to be responsible for opting out, from Jonathan Trenn:
We, the customers, don’t have a choice in the matter. Sure, we can opt out per transaction – that’s if we see the damn notice and hit it in time. But that doesn’t eliminate Facebook from the equation. And the problem there is that the burden is on us…when we didn’t invite Facebook in on all this in the first place.
Jonathan nails itâ€”the customers didnâ€™t ask for this, and yet the full â€œburdenâ€ (and it is a burden) of getting their information out of Facebook is entirely their responsibility, when it should be that of Facebook.
So Iâ€™ll echo what many others are already sayingâ€”the Beacon is an interesting marketing tool, but in order to work with raising the ire of the millions of Facebook users, it has got to be opt-in.